The following Practice Compliance practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Closing a client matter properly is a basic client care, risk management and housekeeping requirement. There are also regulatory and best practice issues to consider.
This Practice Note covers the practical steps involved in and regulatory and other considerations surrounding, closing a client matter.
The SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 require you to show that you provide services to clients in a manner which protects their interests, subject to the proper administration of justice.
The Standards and Regulations are not prescriptive about how you might do this.
The Law Society says that establishing good processes, systems and controls for orderly file closure is central to:
running an efficient practice
fulfilling your obligations to the client to provide a competent service
Where you supervise or manage others providing legal services, you remain accountable for the work carried out through them (paragraph 3.5 SCCS) and for ensuring that the individuals you manage are competent to carry out their role and understand their regulatory obligations (paragraph 3.6 SCCS).
The Law Society suggests you should have a written, standardised policy for file closure. It also suggests you should have a checklist, which accords with your policy, to help preserve a consistent approach. See Precedents: Matter closure form and File or matter closure workflow, and File and matter closure checklist.
If you are Lexcel accredited you will need to perform a concluding
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
This Practice Note is an archive of news from the Loan Market Association (LMA) on LMA documentation and related topics. It covers LMA updates from early 2013 to January 2016. For the latest LMA developments since January 2016, see Practice Note: Loan Market Association (LMA)—latest news on
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.