The following PI & Clinical Negligence guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Any settlement, compromise or payment arising from a claim on behalf of, or against, a child is not binding unless it has been approved by the court.
A compromise involving a child needs to be approved:
first, because the court needs to be satisfied that the compromise is fair: it protects children from any mistakes by their legal advisors or from pressure to settle a case quickly for less than it is worth
secondly, because a court-approved compromise protects the defendant as it ensures that they are properly discharged from the claim
finally, because the court ensures that the money is protected and properly looked after by being invested on behalf of the child until they reach adulthood
See Practice Note: Claims involving a child—Investment of damages.
As a compromise on behalf of a child is not valid until it has been approved by the court, either party may withdraw from the agreement prior to approval being granted, although the doctrine of estoppel may be available to the other party.
The child and the litigation friend must usually attend the approval hearing, unless there is a good reason for them not to.
Where settlement is reached before proceedings have begun and the sole purpose of proceedings is to o
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234