The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Before the commencement of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, Schedule 18, Part 2 (CCA 2013) on the 25 April 2013, the Supreme Court held in Perry that the High Court had no jurisdiction under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) to make a civil recovery order in respect of property located outside the UK.
Following the decision in Perry, the High Court considered Azam in which the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) argued that the property freezing order had been valid at the time it was made, ie prior to the decision in Perry, and therefore that the monies were validly transferred to the UK. In seeking to apply Perry, the respondent in Azam relied on the decision in HM Advocate v Cadder, in which the Supreme Court held that a new statement of law could be applied to the appellant’s case and other cases that were still live.
While the High Court in Azam had accepted that the civil recovery proceedings were ongoing, it nonetheless took the view that ‘the matter of the Luxembourg monies was concluded by their transfer and should not now be re-opened’. In addition, the court held that Cadder had concerned an administrative decision and said nothing about the lawfulness of an act done pursuant to an order of
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Subrogation in insurance and reinsuranceWhat is the right of subrogation?In the context of insurance and reinsurance, the right of subrogation entitles an insurer or reinsurer, having indemnified the (re)insured, to ‘step into its shoes’ to bring an action in the (re)insured’s name. For the purpose
Working with counselInstructing counsel to advocate on a client’s behalf should be a matter of careful thought and preparation. The role of counsel is to provide independent objective advice and to deploy the skill of advocacy on behalf of the client. Although they are part of a team, they also
Contract interpretation—express terms in contractsExpress and implied contractual terms distinguishedContractual terms may be either express or implied:•express terms—are terms which are actually recorded in a written contract or openly expressed in an oral contract at the time the contract is made
Indemnity costs orders—principlesThis Practice Note considers orders for costs determined on an indemnity basis (indemnity costs orders). A court may order that costs are assessed on an indemnity basis so that any doubt as to the costs claimed are resolved in favour of the receiving party. Compare
0330 161 1234