The following Restructuring & Insolvency guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
As a basic rule administrators enjoy a great deal of protection. Their agency status means they rarely incur personal liability, and the company over which they are appointed is protected by the moratorium that comes with the administration.
However, the administrator is not immune from challenge by creditors.
An administrator has wide powers and discretion in the conduct of an administration and, as a result, the courts are generally reluctant to interfere with the conduct of the administration, unless absolutely necessary. However, there are occasions when an administrator's conduct may need to be challenged if they have acted improperly and a creditor is harmed as a result.
There are two main provisions which allow a challenge to the administrator's conduct. The first, paragraph 88 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), gives the court the power to remove an administrator. See Clydesdale Financial Services v Smailes.
The other provision—and the provision with which this Practice Note is concerned—is where a creditor or a member of a company in administration may apply to the court under IA 1986, Sch B1, para 74 claiming that:
the administrator is acting or has acted so as unfairly to harm the interests of the applicant (whether alone or in common with some or
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234