Cases C- 601/18 P Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission [Archived]
Cases C- 601/18 P Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission [Archived]

The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Cases C- 601/18 P Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission [Archived]
  • Case facts
  • Timeline
  • Commentary
  • Related/similar cases

Cases C- 601/18 P Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission [Archived]

CASE HUB

ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 24 September 2020; it is no longer maintained.

See further, timeline , commentary and related/similar cases.

Case facts

OutlineCase C- 601/18 P Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission—appeal to the Court of Justice against the General Court’s judgment in Case T- 475/14 which dismissed an action for annulment of the Commission's decision in the high-voltage power cables cartel (AT.39610).

Latest development On 24 September 2020, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in which it dismissed the appeal in its entirety. The Court of Justice held (amongst other things) that the General Court had not made an error in: (i) concluding that the Commission was entitled to make copy-images of the hard drives of computers of three Prysmian employees during the dawn raid at Prysmian’s premises without first examining the nature of the documents which were contained in those hard drives (including their relevance to the inspection) and to continue that inspection at the Commission’s premises in Brussels in the presence of Prysmian’s lawyers; (ii) applying the principle of economic succession to confirm Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi’s liability for the whole period of the infringement; and (iii) its assessment of whether there
Related documents:

Popular documents