The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
ARCHIVED: this archived Practice Note is not maintained and is for background information purposes only. Further, some of the links may not direct you to the provisions as at the date the guidance in this Practice Note was published.
Although 2016 seems to have had fewer key decisions on non-compliance and relief from sanctions than 2015, perhaps indicating that practitioners are beginning to develop a better understanding from existing authorities on the current formation of CPR 3.9(1) of the court's likely attitude to non-compliance and applications for relief, there has still been a steady stream of them.
We have pulled out a number of themes in some of this year's key decisions on compliance and relief from sanctions, including:
the importance of acting promptly (British Gas v Oak Cash & Carry and Gentry v Miller)—see below
proportionality and justness (McTear v Engelhard, Gopee v Barons Finance and Zumax Nigeria v FCMB)—see below
relevance of the substantive merits (Judge Sykes Frixou v Bhabra, Sloutsker v Romanova and Mukhtar v Thapen)—see below
dealing with unless orders (British Gas v Oak Cash & Carry, Christie v Magnet Ltd, Wave Lending v Batra and SFM Legal Services and Eaglesham v MOD)—see below
Note: 2016 also seems to have seen an increase in applications for
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234