Case C- 98/17 P Philips and Philips France v Commission (Smart card chip cartel) [Archived]
Case C- 98/17 P Philips and Philips France v Commission (Smart card chip cartel) [Archived]

The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Case C- 98/17 P Philips and Philips France v Commission (Smart card chip cartel) [Archived]
  • Case facts
  • Timeline
  • Relevant/related cases

Case C- 98/17 P Philips and Philips France v Commission (Smart card chip cartel) [Archived]

CASE HUB

ARCHIVED—this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 26 September 2018; it is no longer maintained.

See further: timeline and relevant/related cases

Case facts

OutlineAppeal brought by Philips against the judgment of the General Court upholding the Commission’s decision of 3 September 2014 (Case AT.39226) which found an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and imposed fines on Philips for its alleged participation in a cartel for the supply of smart card chips.

OutcomeOn 26 September 2018, the Court of Justice issued its judgment in which it dismissed Philips’ appeal in its entirety.

PartiesApplicant:
• Koninklijke Philips NV (Philips)
• Philips France SAS (Philips France)

Defendant:
• European Commission

Philips, based in the Netherlands, is an international technology company also active in the production and supply of smart card chips.

Market(s)The supply of smart card chips in the EEA.

Smart card chips are used in mobile telephone SIM cards, bank cards, identity cards and passports, pay TV cards, and various other applications. Those used in the SIM segment rely mainly on memory, for example to store telephone numbers, while the smart card chips used in other applications also rely on security devices like cryptography in order to ensure data confidentiality.

BackgroundFollowing an application for immunity lodged by
Related documents:

Popular documents