The following Pensions practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Following two periods of consultation (the first in 2015 and the second in 2016), the government decided to:
cap the value of public sector exit payments to £95,000 (before tax). This will apply to all workers employed by public authorities, not just high earners—for more information, see Practice Note: Capping the size of public sector exit payments (subscription dependent)
require higher paid workers to repay their termination payments if they return to the public sector in any capacity (whether as an employee or self-employed) within a year—for more information, see Practice Note: Claw-back of public sector exit payments (subscription dependent)
achieve greater consistency across the public sector by asking each government department responsible for a particular workforce to agree reforms to their exit payment arrangements so as to reflect a set framework of caps and limits—for more information, see: Further proposed reforms concerning calculation of exit payments below, and
amend the Civil Service Compensation Scheme (CSCS) so as to reflect the above reforms—for more information, see: Consequential reforms to the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, below
Following a third consultation in 2019 about the proposed method of implementing the cap on public sector exit payments, the following documents were eventually published in 2020:
the Restriction of Public Sector Exit Payments Regulations 2020, SI 2020/1122 (the Exit Payment Regulations), which were made on 14 October 2020 and came into force on 4 November 2020
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note explains certain common financial covenants used in commercial finance transactions including:•minimum net worth test•gearing ratio•leverage ratio (or debt to equity ratio)•current ratio (or acid test ratio)•cashflow ratio•interest cover ratio, and•loan to value ratioIt explains:
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.Note: this Practice Note does not deal with the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.