The following Tax practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A capital gain that would otherwise result in a charge to tax may be reduced or eliminated if the taxpayer has made capital losses and is able to set these against the gain. For set-off to be permitted, a loss must be an allowable loss.
In this Practice Note, CGT is used to refer both to capital gains tax and to corporation tax on chargeable gains.
Generally, if selling an asset for a gain would result in CGT, then selling that same asset for a loss will result in an allowable loss. Where an asset is exempt from CGT, and is disposed of for a loss, this will not normally be an allowable loss.
A capital loss is generally calculated in the same way as a capital gain (see Practice Note: How is a capital gain calculated?).
This Practice Note looks at:
the mechanics of using capital losses
rules that can restrict the availability of capital losses
what happens if an asset is lost, destroyed, or becomes worthless
the significance of where a taxpayer is resident, and
what happens when taxpayers deliberately set out to create artificial capital losses
This Practice Note is written from a business tax perspective. For the similar issues that arise in a Private Client context, see Practice Note: CGT—utilising capital losses.
Once it has been established that a loss is an allowable loss,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
This Practice Note identifies the main torts (bar negligence and nuisance, which are covered elsewhere in our related content) and their key characteristics. Specifically:•trespass to land•trespass to the person•privacy/defamation•liability for animals•employers' liability•product
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.