The following Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Stephen Sheen of Ichabod's Industries Limited provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Capital finance differs from revenue finance as revenue expenditure has to be met from current income whereas capital expenditure can be met by borrowing or capital receipts and the costs can be spread over the period in which the benefits of the expenditure are expected to accrue.
The current system, generally referred to as the Prudential Framework ( for England and Wales) is found in Part 1 of the Local Government Act 2003 (LGA 2003). It is a framework that encourages investment in the capital assets that local government needs to improve services and relies on accounting concepts, plus professional and self-regulation. It allows local authorities to raise finance for capital expenditure, without government consent, where they can afford to service the debt without extra government support.
In England, LGA 2003 is supported by the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (England) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/3146. These regulations have been amended several times, with the list of amending regulations comprising the following:
the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/534
the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) (No 2) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/3055
the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/521
the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2007, SI 2007/573
the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) Regulations
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
Source of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine are often traced to John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689), in which he identified the 'executive' and 'legislative' powers as needing to be separate.‘… it may be too great a temptation to human frailty, apt to
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.