The following Environment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The 16th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 16) and the sixth session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 6), was hosted by Mexico at Cancun in 2010. The conference drew almost 12,000 participants, including 5,200 government officials, 5,400 representatives of UN bodies and agencies, intergovernmental organizations and nongovernmental organizations, and 1,270 accredited members of the media.
The decisions made in the Cancun Agreements produced the basis for a comprehensive and far-reaching international response to climate change concerning the reduction in carbon emissions and the creation of a system where all countries are to be accountable to each other for those reductions. Christina Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change summarised the outcome of the Cancun Agreements stating “Cancun was a big step, bigger than many imagined might be possible. But the time has come for all of us to exceed our own expectations because nothing less will do” .
The principal achievements of the Cancun Agreements were:
the parties' agreement to commit to a maximum temperature rise of below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, with a view to reconsidering whether the goal for the average temperature rise should be reduced to
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished responsibility or suicide
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.