The following Employment Q&A produced in partnership with Hugh Olson of Arnot Manderson Advocates provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
ET Rule 37(1) provides that a tribunal has power to strike out the whole or part of a claim on a number of grounds, one of which is that the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious.
For further information, see Practice Note: Striking out and unless orders in employment tribunal proceedings—Grounds that may justify striking out.
Lying in a claim about whether or not a claimant has received Working Tax Credit affecting the calculation of loss might be regarded as ‘unreasonable’ in terms of the rule. An application for striking out could be made on this ground. In contrast, falsely claiming Working Tax Credit in and of itself could not be said to be part of ‘the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted’ and therefore would not be a good ground for a striking out application.
Striking out is a draconian remedy. The Court of Appeal in Blockbuster Entertainments v James gave guidance on how a tribunal should approach an application for striking out. The conduct must have either:
taken the form of a deliberate and persistent disregard of required procedural steps, or
made a fair trial impossible
If either of these conditions is fulfilled the tribunal must go on to consider whether striking out is a proportionate response to
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
An ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support for the process. It can be quicker than institutional arbitration but not if
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.Note: this Practice Note does not deal with the
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
A declaratory judgment is a judgment identifying the rights, duties or obligations of one or more parties in a dispute. It is legally binding, but does not order any action by a party. A court may issue it alone or in conjunction with some other relief such as an injunction and can be granted on an
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.