The following Construction Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Clause 18.104.22.168 of the JCT Design and Build Contract (DB) 2011/2016 provides that, where a Non-Completion Notice has been issued (due to the Contractor having failed to complete the Works (or a Section) by the Completion Date), and provided that an initial notice has been given under clause 22.214.171.124, the Employer may give a further notice that:
‘he requires the Contractor to pay liquidated damages at the rate stated in the Contract Particulars, or lesser rate stated in the notice, in which event the Employer may recover the same as a debt…’
Similar wording is found in clause 126.96.36.199 of the JCT Standard Building Contract (SBC) 2011/2016.
Alternatively, the Employer may give notice that it will withhold or deduct liquidated damages from sums due to the Contractor (clause 188.8.131.52 of DB 2011/2016, clause 184.108.40.206 of SBC 2011/2016). However, in practice this may not always be possible—eg towards the end of the project if no further sums are due to the Contractor.
Recovering liquidated damages as a debt means that the Employer may demand payment of such sums from the Contractor. If the Contractor fails to pay, it could then be open to the Employer
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Entrapment There is no defence of entrapment in English law but it is considered to be an abuse of the process of the court for state agents to lure a person into committing illegal acts and then seek to prosecute him for doing so. The House of Lords said that, although entrapment is not a
Financial Conduct Authority—Principles for Businesses (PRIN)This Practice Note explains the Principles for Businesses (PRIN) set down by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The Principles form part of the FCA’s High Level Standards set out in the FCA’s Handbook. The Principles are a general
Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown CourtCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CA 2020). CA 2020, among other measures, makes provision for the extended use of live links and audio links in criminal proceedings.
TCC—preparing for and attending a pre-trial review (PTR)Note:•this Practice Note gives specific guidance on matters proceeding in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) under the provisions set out in CPR 60, CPR PD 60 and the TCC Guide. As these provisions are additional to the general
0330 161 1234