The following Dispute Resolution Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The simple answer is yes.
Whether you can enter into a retrospective conditional fee agreement (CFA) is not a matter of statute but one of common law and although there has been judicial resistance, the law on whether retrospective CFAs are allowed was settled in Birmingham City Council when Christopher Clarke J, as he then was, held that there was no public policy reason why retrospective success fees under CFA should not be allowed.
Subsequent cases in which retrospective CFAs have been allowed include:
Pentecost—Turner J allowed an appeal on the basis that a collective CFA (CCFA) was compliant with the provisions in the CLSA 1990. In doing so he applied the ordinary meaning of the wording within the CCFA to find that information provided for the purposes of the first CCFA under existing retainers did not need to be resubmitted when a second CCFA was entered into on the basis that the second CCFA clearly provided for it to be retrospective for the purposes of pre-existing instructions to solicitors. For a detailed analysis of this case, see News Analysis: Retrospective collective CFA allowed on appeal (Pentecost v John)
Ghising—Patterson J, on an appeal on a point of principle, has allowed retrospective conditional fee agreements (CFAs). The appeal was successful on the basis that the costs master’s decision was unclear and was not substantiated by the evidence available to the court. In this case, the risk assessment had not changed considerably over time such that a success fee
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Summary assessment—statement of costsSummary assessment is the procedure whereby costs are assessed by the judge who has heard the case or application (see Practice Note: Summary assessment). This Practice Note considers the use of a statement of costs in summary assessment. Form N260 is a model
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public authority.Rather, on one hand the courts have developed case law on which bodies are subject to administrative law through the judicial review procedure;
Guide to using the Lexis®PSL Employment Schedule of Loss applicationThe automated unfair dismissal schedule of loss is designed to make the preparation of a schedule more efficient, accurate and also easier to update. It:•can be used to create a schedule for a claimant or a counter-schedule for a
TCC—preparing for and attending a pre-trial review (PTR)Note:•this Practice Note gives specific guidance on matters proceeding in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) under the provisions set out in CPR 60, CPR PD 60 and the TCC Guide. As these provisions are additional to the general
0330 161 1234