The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The procedure for the circumstances in which a prosecutor believes that an organisation may be in breach of a DPA is set out in paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA 2013).
CCA 2013, Sch 17, para 9(1) provides that, where the prosecutor believes that the organisation has failed to comply with the terms of the DPA, the prosecutor may make an application to the Crown Court to make a finding to that effect. This creates an element of discretion to be exercised on the part of the prosecutor as to whether to institute formal proceedings for breach. As to whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain judicial review proceedings for the failure of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to enforce breach of a DPA, see the comments made obiter by Mr Justice Green, giving judgment in R (on the application of AL) v SFO, XYZ Ltd, in particular, at paragraphs  and . For further information, see Practice Note: Judicial review of prosecution decisions and News Analysis: High Court not forum for dispute linked to DPA (R (on the application of AL) v Serious Fraud Office).
If the SFO does make an application, the Crown Court must decide whether the organisation has failed to comply with the terms of the DPA on the balance
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
BREXIT: As of 31 January 2020, the UK is no longer an EU Member State, but has entered an implementation period during which it continues to be treated by the EU as a Member State for many purposes. As a third country, the UK can no longer participate in the EU’s political institutions, agencies,
Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.