The following Planning practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Biodiversity net gain is a principle which aims to leave the natural environment in a measurably better state after development than beforehand.
Current national planning policy in England, contained in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires:
plans to be informed by a sustainability appraisal that demonstrates how the plan has addressed relevant economic, social and environmental objectives, including opportunities for net gains (para 32)
plans to identify and pursue opportunities for securing measurable net gains for biodiversity (para 174b)
planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by, among other things, minimising impacts on and providing net gains for biodiversity (para 170d)
local planning authorities (LPAs), when determining planning applications, to encourage opportunities to incorporate biodiversity improvements in and around developments, especially where this can secure measurable net gains for biodiversity (para 154d)
The 25-year environment plan, published in January 2018, set out a commitment by the government to strengthen the existing NPPF requirements on net gain. It contained an announcement that the government would consult on whether a mandatory requirement should be introduced for development in England to deliver biodiversity net gain to ensure required development could proceed while improving the environment by more than compensating for biodiversity loss where it could not be avoided or mitigated.
In December 2018, the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
STOP PRESS: The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contains provisions which, on a temporary basis (presently until 31 December 2020) impose significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For further reading, see Practice Note: Corporate
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.