The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note provided information on the Bill of Costs pilot scheme which came to an end on 30 September 2017. This Practice Note is therefore for historical purposes only. For current information on detailed assessment, see: Detailed Assessment—overview.
This Practice Note covers a pilot scheme set out in old Practice Direction 51L which ran from 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2017.
The pilot scheme applied to detailed assessment proceedings in the Senior Courts Costs Office (SCCO) and was voluntary.
The system for producing a Bill of Costs did not engage with the technological advances available and could easily be produced from the time recording made by solicitors throughout the time working on a litigation matter. In addition, since the introduction of the costs budgeting regime other issues have arisen, such as the fact that there is no requirement to set out how the Bill of Costs complies with the last approved budget.
Jackson's final costs report, prior to the introduction of costs budgeting, made two recommendations:
106 A new format of bill of costs should be devised, which will be more informative and capable of yielding information at different levels of generality.107 Software should be developed which will (a) be used for time recording and capturing relevant information and (2) automatically generate schedules for summary assessment of bills for
106 A new format of bill of costs should be devised, which will be more informative and capable of yielding information at different levels of generality.
107 Software should be developed which will (a) be used for time recording and capturing relevant information and (2) automatically generate schedules for summary assessment of bills for
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
Part 8 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009) is a specific corporation tax regime that applies exclusively to the gains and losses of intangible fixed assets. Note, however, that certain intangible fixed assets are excluded from the regime, see Practice Note: Excluded intangible fixed
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.