The following Planning practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Bias and pre-determination can be an issue in planning cases where a planning decision-maker, including a local planning authority (LPA) or planning inspector, is determining a planning application or appeal. Bias arises where a planning officer and/or councillor and/or inspector (the decision-maker) forms or shows bias against or in favour of a person, company or group, or a particular site or locality. Pre-determination is where the decision-maker approaches a decision with a ‘closed mind’. Planning decision-makers are under a duty to act fairly. Clearly, where a decision-maker is biased or has pre-determined a decision, they will not be acting fairly. The decision will have been taken in bad faith and is liable to being quashed if challenged by way of judicial or statutory review. See Practice Note: Determining planning applications—procedure.
Bias can take two forms:
‘actual’ bias: this is where the decision-maker has a personal interest in the outcome of a case. The decision must be quashed unless the interest was so small that it could have played no part in swaying the decision-maker's mind
‘apparent’ bias: this is where a decision-maker does not have a personal interest in a case but their conduct and behaviour give rise to a suspicion that the decision-maker is not impartial
The modern law on apparent bias comes from the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
This Practice Note looks at CE-File electronic working in the courts under CPR PD 51O, in the context of case management. It provides guidance on how to file a document electronically, deal with rejected electronic filings, issue a claim electronically, file electronic bundles (eBundles) for case
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.