The following Construction practice note Produced in partnership with Hardwicke provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Value is a key concern in the case of public procurement, as it is ultimately the taxpayer who funds public services. The law therefore places certain duties on public bodies who contract out services, in order that they find the best value. The duties considered in this Practice Note are additional to those that are imposed by virtue of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, SI 2015/102 (for more on which, see subtopic: Procurement procedure).
The forerunner to the current Best Value regime was known as Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT), contained in the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980. CCT allowed authorities to provide services in-house only where they would win a competition with the private sector. The rules were enforced by the Secretary of State who had the power to order a re-tendering.
The Local Government Act 1999 (LGA 1999) introduced the ‘Best Value’ concept, which came into force on 1 April 2000. The relevant part of LGA 1999 is Part I (which it is useful to read in full). Part I of the LGA 1999 introduced:
Best Value authorities
the Best Value duty
measures to ensure compliance with the Best Value duty
LGA 1999 created a list of authorities who are bound to follow the Best Value duty. These are listed in LGA 1999, s 1 and include English:
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Defending a tort claim—general considerationsIn reality, many claims are ‘defended’ on the basis that the defendant either did not owe the claimant a duty, or there was no breach of duty or there was a break in the chain of causation.In each of those cases, the claimant has failed to establish that
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
The roles of nominated officer and money laundering reporting officerA nominated officer is an individual who is nominated by a firm to receive disclosures under Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) or Part III of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000)—see Requirement to appoint a
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.