The following Construction guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Produced in association with 4 Pump Court
Parties to a 'construction contract' have the right to refer any dispute that has crystallised to adjudication at any time. For more information, see Practice Notes:
The right to adjudicate
Adjudication—is there a ‘dispute’?
What is a construction contract under the HGCRA 1996?
If the right to adjudicate exists, a party should next consider whether adjudication would be a practical way of resolving the dispute. There is a statutory 28 day timetable for adjudication, which may make it inappropriate for large or highly complex claims. This constraint can be overcome to an extent by the parties agreeing to extend the time in which the decision must be reached, or by the referring party dividing the claim into more than one adjudication. Nonetheless, if the claim cannot be fairly determined in the limited period that adjudication allows, it may not be the right approach.
Assuming a party has a right to commence an adjudication and the dispute is capable of resolution by adjudication, what are the main benefits and risks when compared to litigation or arbitration?
The short timescale means that a decision can be obtained quickly, and if necessary enforced with a summary judgment in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) (this takes approximately a further 28 days). By
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234