The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
ARCHIVED: After-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums and success fees continue to be recoverable where the policy or CFA was entered into before 1 April 2013. This position was challenged in Coventry when the Supreme Court considered whether the recovery of success fees and ATE premiums from unsuccessful defendants breached a right to a fair trial under art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). After much debate and an adjourned hearing it was held that recovery did not breach the ECHR. For more information, see: Supreme Court—recoverable success fees/ATE Premiums do not breach Human Rights (Coventry v Lawrence).
See also Practice Note: Conditional fee agreements—success fees.
With effect from 1 April 2013 and following implementation of Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPOA 2012), ATE insurance premiums are no longer recoverable from the losing party except for cases which fall into certain categories. LASPOA 2012 provided for the amendment of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (CLSA 1990). LASPOA 2012, s 44 provided for the amendment of CLSA 1990, s 58A(6) so that a costs order may not require payment by one party (an unsuccessful party) of a success fee payable by another party (a successful party).
LASPOA 2012, s 46 provided for the amendment of CLSA so as to insert the following
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
BREXIT: As of 31 January 2020, the UK is no longer an EU Member State, but has entered an implementation period during which it continues to be treated by the EU as a Member State for many purposes. As a third country, the UK can no longer participate in the EU’s political institutions, agencies,
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.