The following Corporate Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A dividend is a type of distribution made by a company to its members. A company has an implied power to distribute its profits to its members, unless its articles of association provide otherwise. However, it is under no legal obligation to make distributions and therefore need not pay dividends, unless the rights attached to the shares specify otherwise.
The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) governs how a company may make distributions in CA 2006, Pt 23 (CA 2006, ss 829–853). A distribution will be unlawful if it does not comply with the requirements of CA 2006, Pt 23 and the common law rules as modified by those provisions. The CA 2006 does not regulate the actual procedure for the payment of dividends. Instead, this is normally regulated by provisions in a company’s articles of association.
This Q&A assumes that the company that is to declare and pay a dividend is a private limited company, which is not an investment company (as defined in CA 2006, s 833) or an authorised insurance company (see CA 2006, ss 833A, 843). Additional considerations, which have not been considered in this Q&A, may apply to public, listed and AIM companies. This Q&A also assume that the dividend is to be paid in cash, rather than with assets.
The CA 2006 does not define the terms ‘dividend’,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.You should also consider if the proceedings will be
Community order requirementsCommunity order requirements are set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003), as amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 (ORA 2014). Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 152(2)
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.