The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Technology Transfer Block Exemption (TTBE, Regulation 316/2014) provides a safe harbour for certain intellectual property rights (IPRs) licences—technology transfer agreements—which are potentially restrictive of competition (see further: The technology transfer block exemption).
Where IP-related agreements do not fall under TTBE, this does neither mean that provisions on those agreements infringe Article 101 TFEU. Instead, other block exemption regulations may very well apply. As such, it is worth considering the application of the following block exemptions regulations:
the Research and Development Block Exemption Regulation (the R&D Block Exemption Regulation, Regulation 1217/2010)
the Specialisation Block Exemption Regulation (Regulation 1218/2010), and
the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption Regulation (VRBE, Regulation 330/2010).
Failing that, the IP-related agreement in question will have to be assessed individually under Articles 101(1) and (3) TFEU.
If IP-related agreements do not fall under the TTBE—be it because they do not qualify as ‘technology transfer agreements’ or because other conditions of the TTBE are not met—they might very well be able to benefit from other block exemption regulations. The TTBE itself stipulates explicitly that the TTBE 'shall not apply to licensing arrangements in research and development agreements which fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 or in specialisation agreements which fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010'. In addition, certain agreements might fall under
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
The Standard Conditions of Sale (SCS), currently in their 5th edition (2018 revision), are a set of standard conditions which are commonly incorporated into contracts for the sale of residential property. The Standard Commercial Property Conditions (Third Edition—2018 Revision) (SCPC) are used for
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.