The following PI & Clinical Negligence Q&A Produced in partnership with Andrew Wilson provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It is quite common for claimants, particularly those who are employees, to have arranged private cover for healthcare and to seek to use that cover for the provision of certain treatments or therapies following an accident. This may be in respect of the costs of physiotherapy or surgery and, less commonly, for cognitive behavioral therapy or other psychological therapies. Pursuant to section 2(4) of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948, when determining the reasonableness of any medical expenses incurred, the possibility of avoiding those expenses or part of them by taking advantage of treatment available from the National Health Service is to be disregarded. Nonetheless, this does not give the claimant absolute freedom when incurring charges for such expenses.
The major potential pitfall for the claimant in such circumstances is that the defendant will seek to argue that there has been a failure on the part of the claimant to mitigate their loss or that, for some other reason, a proportion of the costs should not be recoverable from the defendant. The most common basis for such argument will be that not all of the claimant’s injury, and therefore loss, is attributable. The claimant’s representative must give careful consideration to any available medical evidence at the stage of determining whether the period of attributable pain and suffering is potentially shorter than the full period
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
This Practice Note covers the legal framework and regulatory guidance to be considered in determining whether an arrangement constitutes a contract of insurance and the possible consequences of carrying on activities relating to a contract of insurance without the requisite regulatory permissionsThe
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
An ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support for the process. It can be quicker than institutional arbitration but not if
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.