The following Share Incentives Q&A Produced in partnership with Christopher Snell of New Square Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Q&A considers whether the provisions set out in Part 7A of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003) apply in a situation where a shareholder has left shares to an employee, former employee or prospective employee in a Will.
Until such time as the effect of ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A is subject to a definitive court ruling, the question of whether leaving shares to an employee in a Will is likely to have disguised remuneration consequences is uncertain. There is no definitive answer to the question and each case will be likely to revolve around the specific factual matrix in which it accrues.
The current legislation surrounding disguised remuneration is to be found in the widely drafted provisions found in ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A. Given the breadth of the drafting, it is correct to say that the legislation applies to many types of arrangements concerning employees.
ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A applies when either: (a) there is a relevant arrangement that is concerned (either in whole or in part) with the provision of rewards, recognition or loans in connection with employment; and (b
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
BREXIT: UK is leaving EU on Exit Day (as defined in the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on the impact of Brexit on e-money requirements, see Practice Note: Impact of Brexit: Payment services and electronic money directives—quick
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
An ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support for the process. It can be quicker than institutional arbitration but not if
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.