The following Corporate Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A buyer will often attempt to include in a share purchase agreement or asset purchase agreement a provision which states that the buyer's actual knowledge of a matter that could give rise to a warranty claim or its advisers' knowledge (the buyer's constructive imputed knowledge) of such matter will not affect its ability to bring a warranty claim. A buyer will be keen to include such provision as it will not have complete control over the information which is provided to its officers, employees or advisers or may have required its advisers to produce a limited due diligence report which 'reports by exception' rather than cover all information disclosed. For an example of such provision, see clause 8.7 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—corporate seller—conditional—long form.
However, a seller will be keen to prevent the buyer from bringing a warranty claim if it has knowledge of the facts, matter or circumstances giving rise to a warranty claim. For an example of such provision, see clause 8.4 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-seller—corporate seller—conditional—long form. Such provision will be heavily negotiated by the seller on the basis that it is subject to a high duty of disclosure under common law, presuming an agreed standard of 'fair disclosure'.
In the case of Eurocopy plc v Teesdale, the agreement contained a provision stating that the warranties were given subject only to
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements
BREXIT: UK is leaving EU on Exit Day (as defined in the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on the impact of Brexit on e-money requirements, see Practice Note: Impact of Brexit: Payment services and electronic money directives—quick
Part 8 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009) is a specific corporation tax regime that applies exclusively to the gains and losses of intangible fixed assets. Note, however, that certain intangible fixed assets are excluded from the regime, see Practice Note: Excluded intangible fixed
The right to notice means a right for the employee to remain in employment for the period of notice, not simply to be paid for it. An employer will therefore often include in the contract an express right to make a payment in lieu of notice ('PILON') as an alternative to giving notice, to ensure
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.