The following Corporate Crime practice note Produced in partnership with Terry McGuinness of Garden Court Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Where a party to criminal proceedings incurs costs as a result of another party’s unnecessary or improper act or omission, the criminal courts may make an order that those costs be paid by the party that acted unnecessarily or improperly. An acquitted defendant may seek costs on this basis, but successful applications are very rare given the very high threshold that must be met.
An award of costs on this basis differs from a defendants' costs order made under section 16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (POA 1985) and from a wasted costs order made against lawyers under POA 1985, s 19A. See Practice Notes: Acquitted defendants' costs orders in criminal proceedings and Wasted costs in criminal proceedings.
The courts’ power to make such a cost order is found in POA 1985, s 19 and regulation 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases (General) Regulations 1986, SI 1986/1335 (the 1986 Regulations).
POA 1985, s 19 provides for the Lord Chancellor to make regulations empowering magistrates’ courts, the Crown Court and the Court of Appeal to make an order as to the payment of costs where the court is satisfied that one party has incurred costs as a result of another’s unnecessary or improper act or omission.
The key regulation is reg 3 of the 1986 Regulations.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What are OFTOs?Offshore Transmission Owners (OFTOs) are the owners of offshore transmission assets which connect offshore wind farms to the onshore electricity network. The transmission assets comprise everything between the offshore point of connection with the generating wind farm assets and the
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSEs) are industry standard pre-contract enquiries used in commercial property transactions. CPSEs are endorsed by the British Property Federation and are free to use. The CPSEs include specific environmental enquiries at enquiry 15 and there are several
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.