The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The jurisdiction to re-open a final decision was established in Taylor v Lawrence. There, it was held that the Court of Appeal possesses a residual jurisdiction 'to avoid real injustice in exceptional circumstances'.
The CPR provides that the Court of Appeal or High Court will not re-open a final determination of any appeal, including an application for permission to appeal, unless:
it is necessary so as to avoid real injustice
the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to do so, and
there is no alternative effective remedy
These three requirements under CPR 52.30 are cumulative (Bishop).
This rule and the associated Practice Direction provisions do not apply to appeals to the County Court (CPR 52.30(3)). As an example of the application of the principle of finality in section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 in such cases, see further News Analysis: High Court cannot overturn lower courts' refusal to grant permission to appeal (Masters Legal Costs Services LLP v Tae Hyeon Cho).
The court's jurisdiction under CPR 52.30 is a tightly constrained jurisdiction, rightly described as exceptional (R (on the application of Goring-on-Thames Parish Council) v South Oxfordshire District Council). In the words of the Court of Appeal in this case, it ‘will be engaged only where some
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234