The following Pensions practice note Produced in partnership with Peter White provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It used to be the case that contracted-out salary-related (COSR) schemes could revalue a deferred member's guaranteed minimum pension (GMP) without increasing the overall deferred pension. The pension in excess of the GMP was effectively reduced so that the overall deferred pension remained the same (ie the excess pension was used to provide the GMP revaluation). This is known as ‘franking’, and ‘anti-franking’ refers to the legislation which prohibits this. It provides for a minimum level of benefit (the ‘relevant aggregate’) to be provided to members and their spouses and civil partners at GMP age. The effect is that rather than reducing the pension in excess of the GMP, schemes must instead protect it, and increase a member’s total pension.
The anti-franking legislation is contained in sections 87–92 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 (PSA 1993) and applies where:
a member has any COSR employment between 6 April 1978 and 6 April 1997, and is therefore entitled to a GMP, and
he left contracted-out employment between 1 January 1985 and 5 April 2016, or
he was still in contracted-out employment when contracting-out was abolished on 6 April 2016 but ceases to be in pensionable service (or reaches GMP age, if earlier) on or after 6 April 2016
HMRC has also produced some guidance which touches on anti-franking.
Anti-franking crops up quite regularly in practice when
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note provides guidance on claims for ‘use and occupation’ or mesne profits, and how and when double rent or double value can be claimed.Claims for use and occupationA claim for use and occupation is possible where there is occupation of land without an express agreement fixing the
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.