The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A key proposition underpinning EU competition law is that competing companies should act independently on markets. In principle, rivalry and competition can be expected to ensure the greatest consumer welfare, the most efficient allocation of resources and, with respect to the EU single market project, help further overall market integration. The European Commission and other regulators are therefore wary of any arrangements which might dampen competition or reduce commercial uncertainty that would otherwise exist between competitors.
However, EU competition law recognises that certain arrangements between competitors can lead to substantial economic benefits, in particular where they combine complementary activities, skills or assets. Such ‘horizontal cooperation’ can be a means of sharing risk, saving costs, increasing investments, pooling know-how, enhancing product quality and variety, and launching innovation faster—thereby delivering benefits for consumers and EU trade, as well as attractive commercial advantages for the companies concerned (see further Horizontal cooperation—checklist).
Agreements involving competitors will be of particular concern from an EU competition law perspective where there is coordination on certain sensitive parameters (for example, on price and/or output) or where the cooperation enables collaborating parties with already strong market positions to gain, maintain or increase market power (and, thereby, lead to negative market effects with respect to prices, output, product quality, product variety or innovation). This includes horizontal collaboration that otherwise has legitimate objectives (as opposed to 'naked'
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
Criminal offences are generally divided into two categories: •conduct crimes, and •result crimesA conduct crime is a crime where only the forbidden conduct needs to be proved. For example, an accused is guilty of dangerous driving if they drove a motor vehicle dangerously on a road or other public
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.