The following Practice Compliance practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Source of funds and wealth was a key focus of the SRA’s Preventing Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism thematic review, published in March 2018. Its findings include that:
most firms understood the distinction between funds and wealth and it was pleased to see the depth of the fee earner’s investigations
10% of firms had difficulties separating the concepts of source of funds and source of wealth, and did not distinguish them
70% of firms use a client declaration as evidence of source of funds, while 28% obtained bank statements and a fifth had no real procedure at all
The thematic review calls on firms to consider:
what is the difference between source of funds and source of wealth?
does each file record in writing where/who funds are from and how they were originally created?
do fee earners understand the client, the transaction and the funds—if not, how do they continue to monitor and assess this information during the lifetime of the transaction?
See further, Practice Note: Money Laundering Regulations 2017—good practice for preventing money laundering and financing of terrorism.
This Practice Note sets out key obligations in relation to source of funds and wealth and the difference between funds and wealth. It explains how to establish and evaluate source of funds and wealth and then how to mitigate related risk. It also covers red flags, common
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
BREXIT: As of exit day (31 January 2020), the UK is no longer an EU Member State. However, in accordance with the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK has entered an implementation period, during which it continues to be subject to EU law. This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on
Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSEs) are industry standard pre-contract enquiries used in commercial property transactions. CPSEs are endorsed by the British Property Federation and are free to use. The CPSEs include specific environmental enquiries at enquiry 15 and there are several
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.