The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Note: This Practice Note is of largely historical interest.
In January 2010 Lord Justice Jackson published his Review of Civil litigation Costs: Final Report, see Practice Note: Jackson final costs report [Archived]. While he did not recommend compulsory Alternative Dispute resolution (ADR), his report does have consequences for those engaged in litigation who should, at every stage, consider ADR.
The terms of reference for Lord Justice Jackson’s review included a requirement to ‘establish the effect case management procedures have on costs and consider whether changes in process and/or procedure could bring about more proportionate costs’.
Lord Justice Jackson has identified ADR as one of a number of areas in which the cost of litigation could potentially be significantly reduced. He has observed that ADR:
‘has a vital role to play in reducing the costs of civil disputes, by fomenting the early settlement of cases’, but that it was
‘under-used and its potential benefits are not as widely known as they should be’
Jackson LJ’s recommendations for ADR are, in brief, that:
there should be a ‘serious campaign’ to make sure litigation lawyers, judges and other users are more aware of the benefits of ADR
a handbook should be produced explaining what ADR is, how it can help and including details of ADR provider
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these to the company's or individual's creditors. Office-holders have various duties and powers in order to ensure that they do this. For
Overlapping insurance policesThere are various reasons why an insured may end up with overlapping insurance cover, whether deliberately or otherwise.Examples include the situation where the insured takes the benefit of other insurance arranged by another party or where, in the commercial world, risk
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.