The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Note: This Practice Note is of largely historical interest.
In January 2010 Lord Justice Jackson published his Review of Civil litigation Costs: Final Report, see Practice Note: Jackson final costs report [Archived]. While he did not recommend compulsory Alternative Dispute resolution (ADR), his report does have consequences for those engaged in litigation who should, at every stage, consider ADR.
The terms of reference for Lord Justice Jackson’s review included a requirement to ‘establish the effect case management procedures have on costs and consider whether changes in process and/or procedure could bring about more proportionate costs’.
Lord Justice Jackson has identified ADR as one of a number of areas in which the cost of litigation could potentially be significantly reduced. He has observed that ADR:
‘has a vital role to play in reducing the costs of civil disputes, by fomenting the early settlement of cases’, but that it was
‘under-used and its potential benefits are not as widely known as they should be’
Jackson LJ’s recommendations for ADR are, in brief, that:
there should be a ‘serious campaign’ to make sure litigation lawyers, judges and other users are more aware of the benefits of ADR
a handbook should be produced explaining what ADR is, how it can help and including details of ADR
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to consider whether judicial review is be an appropriate means of addressing the issues raised by the case at hand. For further guidance, see Practice Note:
Issue of redeemable sharesA limited company that proposes to issue redeemable shares must comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).Why do companies issue redeemable shares?A company may wish to issue redeemable shares so that it has an alternative way to return surplus capital
SRA Code of Conduct for individuals and firmsThis Practice Note provides guidance on the SRA Codes of Conduct, contained in the SRA Standards and Regulations, in force from 25 November 2019. The SRA Standards and Regulations include two Codes of Conduct—a Code forSolicitors, RELs and RFLs and a Code
Reserved judgmentsWhat is a reserved judgment?A court can reserve judgment by giving its decision at a later date in writing, after the trial or hearing (as opposed to an ex tempore judgment which is given by the judge orally straight after the hearing or trial). At the end of the hearing the judge
0330 161 1234