The following Property practice note produced in partnership with Mike Blair of Gillespie Macandrew LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
An agricultural tenant’s right to buy was introduced by the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 (AH(S)A 2003). It is a ‘pre-emptive’ right rather than ‘absolute right’ to buy as it can only be exercised by a tenant when the owner proposes to sell the tenanted land. This Practice Note sets out the right to buy as it was enacted under AH(S)A 2003 and then considers the changes which will be brought in when the relevant sections of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016 (LR(S)A 2016) come into effect.
Only tenants with tenancies governed by the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 (AH(S)A 1991) commonly referred to as ‘1991 Act tenancies’ (see Practice Note: Agricultural holdings in Scotland—snapshot—1991 Act Tenancies) have a statutory right to buy under AH(S)A 2003.
The practical background leading to the introduction of the right to buy is that:
1991 Act tenancies can be of indefinite duration, and
a 1991 Act tenancy significantly reduces the value to the owner of a piece of agricultural property
Normally, if an owner intended to sell a property subject to a 1991 Act tenancy, they would often seek to negotiate with the tenant farmer to sell it to them.
The right to buy brought in by AH(S)A 2003 makes it obligatory in most circumstances for an owner, selling ground
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Breach of statutory dutyThis Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care
Entrapment There is no defence of entrapment in English law but it is considered to be an abuse of the process of the court for state agents to lure a person into committing illegal acts and then seek to prosecute him for doing so. The House of Lords said that, although entrapment is not a
The third edition of the Standard Commercial Property Conditions was published on 27 April 2017 a
Involuntary manslaughterInvoluntary manslaughter—introductionManslaughter can be classified as either voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element—hence the label voluntary manslaughter) but
0330 161 1234