The following Commercial practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers agreements to agree, and why an agreement to agree certain contractual terms at a future date has traditionally been held to be unenforceable. It also looks at the circumstances in which courts have upheld contracts as enforceable despite the apparent lack of certainty as to their fundamental terms.
Traditionally, contracts which contain an agreement to agree certain contractual terms in the future have been held unenforceable as being too uncertain.
The existence of a binding contract is determined by an objective test, which is whether:
on the basis of the evidence, the reasonable man would say that the parties were in agreement and had intended to create legal relations (the test disregards the parties’ own views), and
the contract is sufficiently certain so as to be enforceable
For a contract to be binding its terms must be sufficiently definite to enable the court to give them a practical meaning and, in particular, the terms must be enforceable without further agreement by the parties.
The indicators that the parties are in agreement are as follows:
a concluded bargain
everything is settled that is necessary and leaves nothing to be settled by agreement between the parties, and
something has been left to be determined but that determination must not depend on the agreement of the parties
The case of May and Butcher v R is a leading
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
On the disposition of a property (whether by way of conveyance, transfer or charge), the party making the disposition will normally provide a title guarantee which implies standard form covenants for title. A landlord may give a title guarantee when granting a lease, but this is rare in practice.
The offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intentWounding or causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent is triable only in the Crown Court on indictment. Elements of the offence Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must prove the defendant unlawfully
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.