The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A person is guilty of aggravated vehicle taking if:
they take a conveyance without the owner's or other lawful authority's consent for their own or another's use, or
knowing that any conveyance has been taken without such authority, drive it or allow themselves to be carried in or on it—the basic offence (TWOC) under section 12(1) of the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)
and it is proved that, at any time after the vehicle was unlawfully taken (whether by that person or another) and before it was recovered, the vehicle was driven, or injury or damage was caused
See Practice Note: Taking a conveyance without the owner's consent (TWOC).
The damage must be proved to have been caused in one or more of the following circumstances:
that the vehicle was driven dangerously on a road or other public place
that, owing to the driving of the vehicle, an accident occurred by which injury was caused to any person
that, owing to the driving of the vehicle, an accident occurred by which damage was caused to property, other than the vehicle, and
that damage was caused to the vehicle
The offence is an either way offence. However, when the only aggravated element of the offence is the allegation of damage being caused to the vehicle and/or property, the offence is triable summarily only, if
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.