The following Corporate practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.
This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the note considers the different relationships that may qualify as acting in concert, the significance of concert parties in relation to Rule 9 of the Code, and disclosures in relation to stakebuilding. Acting in concert is not prohibited by the Code, but can have significant implications. The consequences of being a member of a concert party will generally bite under Rules 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 when any of the relevant parties acquire shares.
All persons to whom the Code applies (and their advisers), including parties to a takeover (or potential takeover) should consider their obligations and responsibilities under the Code carefully and take steps to avoid breaching the Code, in particular, Rule 9 (which they may do if they fail to properly aggregate their (and their concert parties) interests in shares).
The key reference to 'acting in concert' in the Code is in the Definitions section.
The operation of the UK takeovers regime has been affected by Brexit, although none of these changes relate to the treatment of concert parties for the purposes of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.Note: this Practice Note does not deal with the
What is a third party debt order (TPDO)?Third party debt orders were previously known as 'garnishee' orders and operated under the regime provided for in CCR Ord 30 and RSC Ord 49 (now revoked). Although the rules in CPR 72 are new, many of the principles with which they are concerned are well
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.