The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, Sch 7 (LASPO 2012) made significant changes to the regime which governs the making of a defendants' costs order (DCO) under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (POA 1985).
Prior to amendment of POA 1985, an acquitted defendant could recover costs properly incurred in criminal proceedings, such as legal expenses or travel costs.
The effect of the amendments was to limit the costs, including legal costs, that an acquitted defendant or appellant may be awarded as part of a DCO.
The system applies to all proceedings on or after 1 October 2012.
The procedure for awarding costs in respect of proceedings commenced prior to 1 October 2012 is governed by the provisions of POA 1985, before amendment by LASPO 2012. See Defendants' costs orders in proceedings commenced prior to 1 October 2012 [Archived]
LASPO 2012, Sch 7 did not affect the law in respect of a court's jurisdiction to make a DCO.
The latest Costs Practice Direction (Practice Direction (Costs in Criminal Proceedings) 2015, (as amended by the Practice Direction (Costs in Criminal Proceedings) 2015 Amendment No. 1 of 23 March 2016) came into force on 5 October 2015. See Practice Note: Criminal Practice Directions.
The jurisdiction to make a DCO is set out below.
A magistrates’ court may make a DCO where:
an information laid is
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
Part 8 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009) is a specific corporation tax regime that applies exclusively to the gains and losses of intangible fixed assets. Note, however, that certain intangible fixed assets are excluded from the regime, see Practice Note: Excluded intangible fixed
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.