The following Corporate Crime guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The application procedure for making an abuse argument is governed by the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 (CrimPR), SI 2015/1490 and directions in support of these rules are provided in the Criminal Practice Directions para 3C. The burden of proof is on the applicant, on the balance of probabilities, to show that there has been some impropriety in the decision to prosecute or the manner in which the prosecution has been proceeded which means that either a fair trial is no longer possible or it is no longer fair to try the accused.
Evidence can be called by both the defence and prosecution. The prosecution is under an obligation to disclose relevant unused material. The judge will make a determination on this evidence.
Abuse of process arguments can be raised in the magistrates’ court. In Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court Ex parte Bennett, the House of Lords ruled that the magistrates’ jurisdiction to protect the court from abuse is restricted to matters affecting the trial of the accused, such as delay or manipulation of the court procedure. Any challenge of a ruling following an abuse argument in the magistrates’ court would be made in the High Court by way of judicial review or in the Crown Court by way of rehearing.
A decision in the Crown Court is incapable of judicial
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234