The following Public Law practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A public authority need not disclose information following a request for information made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) if:
the estimated cost would exceed the appropriate limit
the request is vexatious
the request is repeated, or
an exemption applies
The FIA 2000 contains 24 exemptions which permit an authority to withhold the requested information. These exemptions fall broadly into the following two categories:
qualified exemptions, which are subject to a public interest test
When dealing with a freedom of information request, even one where an exemption applies, an authority must still act according to the duty to provide advice and assistance so far as it would be reasonable. And so, even when information is deemed exempt, an authority should not merely issue a refusal notice, but rather it should also consider what assistance to provide to the applicant. For further reading, see Practice Note: Procedural traps in relation to FOI requests—Duty to provide advice and assistance.
This Practice Note focuses on absolute exemptions under FIA 2000. For information on qualified exemptions, see Practice Note: Qualified exemptions to a freedom of information request.
For further guidance on the exemptions given by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), see ICO—Guidance Index.
Absolute exemptions relate to the primary duties placed upon an authority by FIA 2000, s 1:
the duty to confirm or
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
Community order requirementsCommunity order requirements are set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003), as amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 (ORA 2014). Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 152(2)
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.