The following Arbitration practice note Produced in partnership with Stephenson Harwood provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The recovery of costs is an important part of most arbitrations. When considering applying to the tribunal for an award on costs, or resisting an application for costs, it is important to understand:
any costs agreement between the parties
what constitutes ‘the costs of the arbitration’
the tribunal’s authority to award costs and the basis on which they award costs
how interest will be awarded
the costs award
how to challenge a costs award
The parties cannot enter into an agreement on the allocation of the costs of the arbitration to the effect that one party should pay the costs in any event prior to the dispute. This is the only mandatory provision of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) relating to costs. It would appear that it is aimed at ensuring a party that agrees to pay all or part of the costs of an arbitration is aware of the scale of the dispute and potential costs before doing so.
With exception to the above, there is specific provision within AA 1996 for the parties to enter into agreements about costs, including:
that the tribunal shall be able to award costs in a manner otherwise than in accordance with the general principle that costs should follow the event except where there are appropriate reasons otherwise in the circumstances of the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day, ie Friday 31 January 2020, has implications for practitioners considering service out of the jurisdiction. For guidance, see: Cross border considerations—checklist—Service—Brexit specific.This Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.