The following Arbitration guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
For a general introduction to the three main heads of challenging or appealing an arbitral award under sections 67–69 of the Arbitration Act (AA 1996), see Practice Note: AA 1996—challenging and appealing arbitral awards in the English court.
A party to arbitration proceedings may (on notice to the other parties and to the tribunal) apply to the court challenging an award in proceedings on the ground of serious irregularity affecting the tribunal, the proceedings or the award (AA 1996, s 68(1)).
Generally speaking there will be no question regarding the status of a tribunal or arbitrator’s decision. If a challenge is made on the ground of serious irregularity and the status of the decision is not clear, the court will consider the status of the decision as a threshold point before it proceeds. A decision cannot give rise to a serious irregularity challenge if the court considers that it is not an award (see ZCCM v Kansanshi). In ZCCM v Kansanshi, Cockerill J set out some useful guidance to consider when seeking to determine the distinction between an award and a procedural order in these circumstances, see News Analysis: AA 1996, s 68 challenge to an arbitrators’ ‘ruling’ fails on threshold point (ZCCM v Kansanshi).
Serious irregularity is defined as irregularity that falls within
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234