The following Planning Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Local Planning Authority (LPA) in this situation may be relying on the judgment in R v Coventry City Council Ex p Arrowcroft Group Plc, which is sometimes cited to refuse an application under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) which seeks to amend conditions which would be inconsistent with the description of development authorised by the original permission. In Arrowcroft, the court held that LPAs can only impose different conditions upon a new planning permission under TCPA 1990, s 73 if they are conditions which the LPA could lawfully have imposed upon the original planning permission, in the sense that they do not amount to a fundamental alteration of the proposal put forward in the original application. So, where an application under TCPA 1990, s 73 would lead to a fundamental inconsistency between the conditions and the description of the development contained in permission, it must be refused, see Practice Not
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. For guidance, see Practice Note: Coronavirus
A limited company that proposes to issue redeemable shares must comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).Why do companies issue redeemable shares?A company may wish to issue redeemable shares so that it has an alternative way to return surplus capital to shareholders without
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.