The following Planning Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Section 171B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 states that a breach in a planning condition achieves immunity from enforcement action after the end of the period of ten years beginning with the date of the breach. Thereafter the ongoing lawfulness of the breach can be proven through an application for a Certificate of Lawfulness.
Whether the agricultural occupancy condition has been breached depends on the specific facts of the situation and wording of the condition. Although we have found no case law specifically in relation to whether owning a farming enterprise counts as being employed in agriculture, related case law has shown that the courts have taken a liberal interpretation of agricultural occupancy conditions in establishing that there has been no breach. See for example:
Shortt v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government—this involved an interpretation of dependency in the context of an agricultural occupancy condition, but includes some useful general commentary on requirements and circumstances to satisfy the condition. The Court of Appeal specifically mentioned in this case that ‘the agricultural occupancy condition had not tied occupation to a particular agricultural enterprise, nor required the continuing profitability of the agricultural business’
Ellis v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government —this case considered a breach of an agricultural occupancy condition and held that even though t
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions typically found in an escrow
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.