The following Property Q&A Produced in partnership with Helen Galley of XXIV Old Buildings provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In the absence of any express obligation to repair, the general rule is that neither the dominant or the servient owner (see Jones v Price at  and Duke of Westminster v Guild at [700F]) is under any obligation to repair the right of way. Taylor v Whitehead  2 Doug KB 745 (not reported by LexisNexis®) and Ingram v Morecraft at [51–52]  33 Beav 49 (not reported by LexisNexis®) suggest that as a matter of common law, the person who has the use of the thing ought to repair it so that if the servient owner wants the way repaired he should do so himself. The dominant owner will have ancillary to the right, a right to enter onto the land and repair the way including upgrading and improving it that is reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the easement granted. He will not be able to recover the costs of so doing unless he was abating a nuisance or the servient owner was in default of an obligation to repair.
Next, we turn to the situation where there is an express obligation on the part of the servient owner to carry out repairs to the way. A covenant to repair is a positive covenant and so, will not bind a successor in title to the original covenantor unless he or she has
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note provides an introduction to intercreditor agreements and their key provisions. This Practice Note:•explains the purpose of having an intercreditor agreement and when an intercreditor agreement would be used instead of a deed of priority or subordination deed•provides links to
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
Codicils may be used for making any alteration in a Will such as to alter the executors or make changes in legacies, whether by addition or deletion but that is by no means their only use. As a general rule, substantial changes are best achieved by means of a new Will and codicils are more
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.