The following Property Q&A Produced in partnership with Helen Galley of XXIV Old Buildings provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It is not clear whether the couple are married or cohabitees, but we are told that the property in question is their home and is jointly owned. It is possible that when it was transferred to them that an express declaration of trust was included in the transfer to the effect that they were to held upon trust for themselves as beneficial joint tenants or, alternatively, as tenants in common in some agreed shares which need not be equal. If there was an express declaration of trust, it would be conclusive of their interests. If it provided that they were to hold as beneficial joint tenants that would mean that neither owns a divided share in the property but that if the joint tenancy was to be severed, they would, thenceforward, hold as tenants in common in equal shares. Section 36 of the Law of Property Act 1925 governs severance of a beneficial joint tenancy. Although there is a presumption in favour of severance, it would be sensible for the parties in this case who appear not to be in dispute, to record the agreement to sever in writing or for one of them to serve notice of severance on the other.
If instead of there being a beneficial joint tenancy there was an express statement in box ten of the transfer to A
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished responsibility or suicide
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.