The following Tax Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Once an option to tax land and buildings has been made, it can only be revoked in certain circumstances.
One of these circumstances is where an option has had effect for more than 20 years. Under paragraph 25 of Schedule 10 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994, a taxpayer can revoke an option to tax that has had effect for more than 20 years provided the taxpayer either meets certain conditions or gets prior permission from HMRC.
The conditions are set out in HMRC VAT Notice 742A, section 8.3 and have force of law. The taxpayer must meet Condition 1 or all of Conditions 2–5.
Condition 1 would not apply here as this condition relates to the taxpayer (seller) not having a relevant interest in the land.
In brief, Conditions 2–5 are:
the taxpayer or a relevant associate has held an interest in the land for more than 20 years from the date of the option
the land is not a capital good scheme item
the taxpayer or a relevant associate has not made a supply of the land/ building for less than mark
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
On the disposition of a property (whether by way of conveyance, transfer or charge), the party making the disposition will normally provide a title guarantee which implies standard form covenants for title. A landlord may give a title guarantee when granting a lease, but this is rare in practice.
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.