The following Restructuring & Insolvency Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In this Q&A, the second statutory demand was served on the debtor after the presentation of the bankruptcy petition.
Section 267(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that ‘…a creditor’s petition may be presented to the court in respect of a debt or debts only if, at the time the petition is presented—’. There then follows a list of criteria that must be satisfied, and throughout that list is reference to ‘the debt’. Accordingly, it appears that a petition must be based on a qualifying debt (where, among other criteria, there must either be an unsatisfied statutory demand or unsatisfied execution of judgment) that existed at the time of presentation, and would not apparently include debts that have become subsequently due. A petition can be presented in respect of a debt due at some future by certain time, but the appropriate form of statutory demand would need to be used for that purpose.
A petitioning creditor cannot seek a bankruptcy order where the petition debt has been paid, but may still seek a bankruptcy petition where only part of the petition has been paid (see for example Lilley v American Express Europe Ltd).
In your circumstances, it does not appear th
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.