GLOSSARY

Appeal panel definition

What does Appeal panel mean?

An independent panel deciding appeals against refusal by the admission authority of admission to a state school.

3 to 5 members sit on each appeal panel. It must have at least three trained members, including at least one 'lay member', with no personal experience in school management (unless as a governor) and at least one member who is either experienced in the provision of education, or is a parent. See the Schedule to the School Admissions (Appeal Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/9).

Minimise

View the related practice notes about Appeal panel

School admissions for maintained schools

Every child of compulsory school age must engage in full-time education; parents have a duty to secure their child’s regular attendance at school (section 7 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996)). In nearly every case, the child is enrolled at a school for this purpose. Admission to a school roll is often simple, but complications arise when the number of applicants for admission exceeds the school’s capacity.Academies are technically independent schools, but they are actually state-funded and use the maintained schools’ system of admissions (admission at fee-paying independent schools is entirely a matter for the school and the parents, subject only to laws on equalities). In either sector, the admission of children with education, health and care (EHC) plans (under the Children and Families Act 2014) is usually controlled through their statutory process. Admissions to early-years classes in maintained schools are hardly regulated at all, but admission to an early years class of a primary school is irrelevant to graduation to, or admission to, the reception year of compulsory schooling. Parents/Guardians must apply afresh.In addition to the legislation, there is important statutory guidance in the School Admissions and Admission Appeals Codes. The latest School Admission Codes were issued in 2014 in England, and 2013 in Wales. The latest School Admission Appeals Codes were issued in 2012 in England and 2013

The Supreme Court—overview of the changes from the previous House of Lords regime [Archived]

The Supreme Court—overview of the changes from the previous House of Lords regime [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. NOTE: THIS PRACTICE NOTE IS FOR HISTORIC PURPOSES ONLY. Introduction—the nature of the changes and transitional arrangements The guiding ethos behind the change to the Supreme Court was the desire to separate the judicial function of the House of Lords from its parliamentary arm. Additionally, there was a desire to open up the accessibility of the appeal system within the highest court of the land. These changes did not involve a wholesale change in terms of access per se. The routes to appeal to the Supreme Court remain as they were for the House of Lords. Overall, the changes are not substantive in scope with the exception, perhaps, of the inclusion within the new Supreme Court's remit of jurisdiction to hear matters concerning devolution issues (previously the jurisdiction of the Privy Council). Other than that, the changes are more stylistic in terms of updating the terminology, the style and feel of the procedure and the modernisation of the environment. The transitional arrangements for matters currently pending in the House of Lords are provided in SCR 55. This simply states that the new Rules apply to pending matters. No doubt the Registry has/will provide practitioners with cases pending with direct assistance regarding this. Changes in terminology The main

Discover our 23 Practice Notes on Appeal panel

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

View the related precedents about Appeal panel

ET3 grounds for resisting unfair dismissal claim — conduct

ET3 grounds for resisting unfair dismissal claim — conduct [Insert in para 6.1 of response form ET3:] 1 It was an express term of the Claimant's employment as [a storeman] that the theft of supplies would result in instant dismissal. 2 On [insert date], the Claimant was suspected by the [Stores Manager] of having stolen a box of electrical equipment from the storeroom. 3 The Claimant was immediately suspended on full pay whilst a full investigation was carried out into the alleged theft [specify steps taken]. That investigation confirmed the Store Manager's suspicion. 4 On [insert date] the Claimant was interviewed by the Store Manager in the presence of his union representative. He denied any responsibility for the missing goods. 5 On [insert date] a formal disciplinary hearing was held by the [General Manager] in accordance with the Respondent's disciplinary procedure. At the hearing, the Claimant was represented by his union representative, and was given every opportunity to present his case. 6 The [General Manager] was satisfied on the evidence that the Claimant had stolen the goods, and he summarily dismissed him for gross

Dive into our 1 Precedents related to Appeal panel

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

View the related q&as about Appeal panel

If an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court is refused by the Supreme Court, is this the final decision or can this be appealed?

If an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court is refused by the Supreme Court, is this the final decision or can this be appealed? The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases. It hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population and plays an important role in the development of UK law. It hears appeals on arguable points of law of general public importance from, among others, the civil division of the Court of Appeal and, in some very limited cases, the High Court. The Supreme Court has its own set of rules (Supreme Court Rules 2009, SI 2009/1603) (SCR) and its own set of Practice Directions. These are entirely separate to the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, SI 1998/3132 (CPR 1998) which govern procedure in the County Courts, High Court and Court of Appeal. An application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court direct to the Supreme

When the Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal: Is there any requirement for any reasons to be given for the decision? Is there any provision allowing for any party to request an oral hearing to challenge the decision? Is there any possibility to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union where the issue relates to a matter of EU law?

When the Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal: Is there any requirement for any reasons to be given for the decision? Is there any provision allowing for any party to request an oral hearing to challenge the decision? Is there any possibility to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union where the issue relates to a matter of EU law? Requirement to give reasons for a refusal of permission Supreme Court Rules Practice Directions (SCR PD) 3, para 3.3.1 provides that the appeal panel (comprised of at least three judges of the Supreme Court) will first decide whether an application for permission to appeal is admissible, ie whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. If it is established that the court does not have jurisdiction, the appeal panel will refuse permission on that ground alone and will not consider the content of the application. It will give a reason for deciding that the application is inadmissible. Supreme Court Rules 2009 (SCR 2009), SI 2009/1603, r 16(1) provides that every admissible application for permission to appeal will be considered on paper without a hearing by the panel. With regards to admissible applications for permission to appeal, SCR 2009, SI 2009/1603, r 16(2) (as confirmed by SCR PD 3, para 3.3.2) provides that the appeal panel may: • refuse permission • grant permission • invite the parties

See the 2 Q&As about Appeal panel

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

View the related News about Appeal panel

Banks may be liable for push payment fraud, court rules

Law360, London: The Court of Appeal ruled on 14 March 2022 that banks could be liable if they fail to protect individual customers against push payment fraud, extending the scope of a key legal obligation in a lawsuit against Barclays over a £700,000 (US$913,000) scam.

Local Government weekly highlights—10 March 2022

This week's edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes updates on the government’s planned Human Rights Act and Healthcare reform and a case report of the Supreme Court decision in Croydon BC v Kalonga. Case analysis includes the challenge to the Secretary of State’s implementation of a change to the arrangement of local government in Cumbria County Council v SSLUHC; the public procurement decision in Excession Technologies v Police Digital Service; the challenge brought by two children to the Secretary of State’s decisions relating to the provision of COVID-19 vaccines in AB v SSHSC; the decision on school exclusions in YA v Independent Appeal Panel of Swansea Council; and in Global 100 Ltd v Jimenez, on whether a vacant office building occupied by property guardians fell under the definition of an HMO. The weekly highlights also includes further updates on public procurement, governance, education, children’s social care, social care, healthcare, social housing, planning, licensing and local government finance and also covers the usual legislation, updated guidance and news on coronavirus (COVID-19).

Read the latest 36 News articles on Appeal panel

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

View the latest Halsbury's Laws of England documents on Appeal panel

183. Code for school admissions.

The Secretary of State1 must issue, and may from time to time revise, a code for school admissions2 containing such provision as it thinks appropriate in respect of the discharge by: (1) local authorities3; (2) the governing bodies of maintained schools4; (3) admission forums5; (4) appeal panels6; and (5) adjudicators7,of their respective functions8 in relation to admission arrangements9. The code may impose requirements, and may include guidelines setting out aims, objectives and other matters, in relation to the discharge

Appeal panel is referenced 1 in Halsbury's Laws of England

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts."

RWE

Access all documents on Appeal panel

GET ACCESS NOW

Top