Restructuring and insolvency

This subtopic contains the following guidance on EU level rules relating to restructuring and insolvency:

Recast Regulation on Insolvency

  1. Practice Note: List of EU member states and official languages for R&I lawyers

  2. Practice Note: Recast Regulation on Insolvency as between Member States—main, secondary and territorial proceedings considers the scope of the Recast Regulation on Insolvency between Member States of the EU, main proceedings, secondary proceedings and territorial proceedings, primacy of main proceedings over secondary proceedings, powers of officeholders in main proceedings over secondary proceedings, synthetic secondaries, communication between officeholders and courts, information available from the INSOL Europe: European Insolvency Regulation Case Register, Companies House—ECLAIR and the new European database

  3. Practice Note: Recast Regulation on Insolvency (Member State to Member State)—table of differences between main and secondary proceedings summarises the differences between main and secondary proceedings under the Recast Regulation on Insolvency as it operates between Member States

  4. Practice Note: Recast Regulation on Insolvency (Member State to Member State)—effect of cross-border recognition looks at the effect of cross-border recognition under Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (the EU Recast Regulation on Insolvency) between Member States. It looks

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest EU Law News

Commission launches consultation to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act and strengthen the EU cybersecurity framework

The European Commission launched a call for evidence to support the preparation of a legislative proposal to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act. The initiative aims to strengthen EU cyber resilience, update the mandate of the EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and improve the effectiveness of the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework. The Commission noted that the cybersecurity landscape has become significantly more complex and threat‑intensive since the Act’s adoption in 2019, while subsequent EU legislation has expanded ENISA’s tasks beyond its original mandate, creating the need to streamline, simplify and supplement the existing framework to ensure coherence, reduce administrative burdens and improve implementation for businesses and users. The initiative focuses on measures to support a secure and resilient Information and Communication Technology supply chain and the EU cybersecurity industrial base, addresses shortcomings in the certification framework such as slow adoption, unclear roles, limited agility and insufficient clarity on covered risks, including non‑technical factors, and considers alignment with newer instruments such as the Cyber Resilience Act. The Commission outlined policy options ranging from non‑legislative measures to targeted or comprehensive regulatory revision, stating that EU‑level action is required to prevent internal market fragmentation and to secure long‑term economic and social benefits through greater harmonisation, stronger cybersecurity and resilience, more efficient incident response and enhanced protection of fundamental rights, including personal data. The call for evidence will run until 20 June 2025.

View EU Law by content type :

Popular documents