It is a well-established principle of statutory construction that the interpretation of a statute designed to implement, or concerning subject matter connected with, an international human rights treaty should be in harmony with the provisions of that treaty1. The presumption is that Parliament cannot have intended to legislate contrary to its obligations in international human rights law, and thus that a provision of either primary or secondary legislation that is ambiguous will be interpreted compatibly with the rights guaranteed by an unincorporated treaty2. United Kingdom courts will therefore favour an interpretation of a statute that is compatible with the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234